The philosophical and spiritual problems of our age are so great that what our time calls for are new manifestos of knowledge and being. We need a kind of spiritual change that exceeds the political. Unfortunately most of us in the Westernized world spend more time trying to escape from ourselves (sex, shopping, addiction, fashion, entertainment, success), than we ever spend reflecting on the state of our existence, our heart or our soul. We are people driven by our desires: desires which destroy our hearts and any ability to have a connection to the greater spiritual realities that are all around us. As the Qur’an says, “God does not change the condition of a people, until they change their own condition.”
In the classic decolonial manifesto, Discourse on Colonialism, Aimé Césaire described Western life as a poison infecting the planet. Césaire wrote that to understand our existence, “First we must study how colonization works to decivilize the colonizer, to brutalize him in the true sense of the word, to degrade him, to awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence, race hatred, and moral relativism.” For Césaire, “a gangrene has set in … a center of infection has begun to spread …” The poison Cesaire warned of is a philosophical and spiritual poison that infects each of us today.
In the American Indian scholar Vine Deloria Jr’s final book, The World We Used to Live In, he writes: “The secularity of the society in which we live must share considerable blame in the erosion of spiritual powers of all traditions, since our society has become a parody of social interaction lacking even an aspect of civility. Believing in nothing, we have preempted the role of the higher spiritual forces by acknowledging no greater good than what we can feel and touch.” The de-sacralization of the self and our lifeworlds is leaving our spiritual hearts dead.
To save ourselves, to avert catastrophe, we need to make what Walter Mignolo calls an “epistemic geopolitical move.” That demands a form of critique that is deeply engaged in what is known in Arabic as muhasabah, or self-examination, on three levels: examination of the self and one’s spiritual state; an examination of the dominant hierarchies that we all interact with such as gender, race, class, sexuality, and religious domination; and finally an examination of one’s local knowledge and the place from which critique is emanating. In recentering on the sacred in this process of self-examination, we can learn from Chicana feminists and the emerging idea of “decolonial love.”
Laura Pérez, UC Berkeley Professor of Ethnic Studies, connects “decolonial love” to the Mayan principle of In’Laketch: tu eres mi otro yo (you are my other me). Pérez explains that “not only are we interwoven, we are one. I am you and you are me. To harm another is thus to literally harm one’s own being. This is a basic spiritual law in numerous traditions.” This shift in the geopolitics of knowledge involves a turn away from Descartes and Western modernity’s centering of human consciousness in the mind, to a recentering of consciousness in the spiritual heart (qalb). This idea of a heart centered knowledge is central to many spiritual traditions including Christianity, Buddhism and Islam, and is echoed by Subcommandate Marcos and the Zapatista adage to center politics below and to the left, where the heart is in Aztec and Mayan cosmology.
Similar to Gloria Anzaldua’s concept La Facultad, a form of inner knowledge, is the Islamic concept of Al Basira, the eye of the heart, which is the center of spiritual perception if properly developed. As the great Mystic philosopher Al-Ghazali put it in his masterwork of the inner sciences of Islam, Ihya’ ulum al-din, “Creation refers to the external, and character to the internal, form. Now, the human is composed of a body which perceives with ocular vision (basar) and a spirit (ruh) and a soul (nafs) which perceive with inner sight (basira). Each of these things has an aspect and a form which is either ugly or beautiful. Furthermore, the soul which perceives with inner sight (basira) is of greater worth than the body which sees with ocular vision.” In seeing with the eye of our heart we can begin to differentiate between form and meaning, as the outward forms of things are not always their internal and spiritual reality.
The vision of our hearts has become blinded by the poison of base materialism. In the verse poetry of the early female Sufi saint, Rabi’a al-Adawiyya: “O children of Nothing! Truth can’t come in through your eyes, Nor can speech go out through your mouth to find [God], Hearing leads the speaker down the road to anxiety, And if you follow your hands and feet you will arrive at confusion. The real work is in the Heart: Wake up your Heart! Because when the Heart is completely awake, Then it needs no Friend.”
To break from the chains of modernity, we must learn both from philosophers of decoloniality and the spiritual sciences. Ultimately, we must walk down the path of love, to see each other in the divine light we were born into. As the great mystic philosopher Ibn Arabi said, “I believe in the religion of love, whatever direction its caravans may take, for love is my religion and my faith.”

![A Tahrir Moment on Wall Street [Spanish] A Tahrir Moment on Wall Street [Spanish]](http://www.adbusters.org/files/magazine/teaser/flag_spanish_guardian.png?1317158534)













What does the word
What does the word "spiritual" mean? Frankly I think it seems a bit overused and poorly defined. I think that this reflects a deeper problem with both Adbusters and the left; everyone involved with them is concerned with ideas rather than practicality. That's one of the ways the corporate media controls us. It hypnotizes us with endless debates and commentary about things like who the next president is going to be, and as a result we neglect local politics and grow ignorant of what is actually happening within the massive black box we call "the government". If every leftist text was more practical, direct, and literal in nature, then more people would understand them and more direct action would be taken.
I agree! Also, the article
I agree!
Also, the article uses nice words and ideas that everyone can stand behind, but what solid foundation do we have? If the writer is claiming we must break away from our false needs and desires, and look at our selves, is that possible if the "shared idea" is that we are surrounded by falseness. What allows someone to choose what is proper culture? What is true? We, ourselves are representations of ideologies our past and present culture. We can't exist outside of culture. Representation and culture are conjoined twins.
Also the writer states, "To break from the chains of modernity, we must learn both from philosophers of decoloniality and the spiritual sciences". The ability to be truly "decolonized" by an idea is not possible. Our culture is defined by our ideologies. You can't break away from an ideology completely. It will always be. What you've listed as a priority for society is just another form of what everyone else has been saying. Same shit, different day. Try to get more specific other than love. Ya we know. Everyone knows. So what are we going to do about it?
"Property is the father of
"Property is the father of Poverty and Crime" Aristotle - we must change our perception, relationship, and understanding of property/ownership - sadly globalization has led to a homogenization of ideas about property and now here we sit all of us seeking dominion over the land in an over exploited world of constant extraction with limited resources - welcome to post apocalypse - now shuck all of your perceptions, go back to the drawing board, and re-imagine - an engineering professor told me to get used to naming things, making them my own, then one can see the true nature of the problem without the baggage of past approaches - let's get busy
The message I got out of the
The message I got out of the article (after a quick, internet based read, before jumping to the next article/website, though I did actually read it) is: Buy less stuff and seek God/Love, instead. I agree.
I think most anti-western
I think most anti-western critiques are largely overblown. Sure, the A-bomb was developed in the West, and Nazism, some of the world's first truly nihilistic philosophies, exploitative capitalist industrialization colonialism and most of the plasticized consumer world mostly originated in the west. But look at history, all these things were on the cusp of emerging elsewhere, too. (Look at Japan during WWII...and don't say they were passively "corrupted" by the west! To argue such a view is to make an entire civilization look infantile by perpetuating illusion that non-western civilizations are childishly dependent on cultural influence from the Europe.)
But to focus on all of this is to downplay the great things western civilization has achieved--like understanding what MATTER IS ACTUALLY (quantum physics), figuring out how ALL LIVING THINGS CAME TO BE (evolution), all of western literature (Shakespeare, Faulkner, Balzac, the whole gamut) and its art (Da vinci, Rembrandt, van Gogh). Many more things could be identified to highlight the merit of western civilization, and anybody who suppresses this information is operating under an ideology that forces them to be unhistorical.
Dude, everything you listed
Dude, everything you listed is EUROPEAN. And as an actual European, let be be the first to say:
Get stuffed you twit wannabe.
I'm sorry, did you just say
I'm sorry, did you just say that Europe isn't part of "the west"? Europe conquered FOUR CONTINENTS. (Africa, Australia,South America, and North America(don't try to pin that one on the US, European countries had occupied every part of it before the US did)).
The same thing can be said
The same thing can be said about any other view.. At the end of the day its a view. Im in complete agreement with you in regards to western contribution to the world. However, we have erased the civilization that have contributed (with out which, we would come this far) to the Western civilization from our text book; ever since the early 1900s.
The concept of the author is on the dot, as far as we becoming too materilistic. And yes, think the author have gOne too far with blaming; as the older generation in the west dose not like where we came to.
Love this article. Beautiful.
Love this article. Beautiful.
Eastern countries are plagued
Eastern countries are plagued by the same problems of materialism just as much as the West. Articles like this paint a rosy picture of Eastern societies living in peace & bliss, holding hands and singing songs around a communcal campfire of respect. I'm really sick to death of seeing this stereotype. The fact is, most people in the East couldn't give a rats about Sufi philosophies or Buddhist lessons, and want the latest shiny gadget as much as any Brit or American. As for how the East is so much more philosophically and spiritually advanced than the West... I've traveled extensively through the Middle East and Asia, and you're more likely to find people sincerely practicing Eastern traditions in Greenwich Village.
Personally, I think it's just as wrong to romanticise the East as it is to demonise it. But hey, don't let common sense get in the way of the Western hate fest.
I could not agree more. I was
I could not agree more. I was born in south east Asia and the new generation's obsession with materialism is as bad if not worse. I no longer live in the country but was brought up there long enough to notice the difference where ppl have mansions(literally) next to bostis (e.g slums, fevelas ) or drive 7 series beamers (the tax rate for cars there is double so a 7 series is literally costing 200-300 US $). The post-colonial era in the Third World has brought about a new sense of control by the elites in these parts of the world and now they control the practically non-existent middle class and lower class. So take away the Caucasian master and replace it with your own brother. It may sound harsh but its 100% true. Coming from an above middle class family(but not extreme or extravagant) I have seen both sides of the picture and now living in the Western world, they both have +ve and -ves. But the OWS and the 90-10 is a joke compared to the class disparities in the Eastern world of "peace and bliss".
Shit dude, I don't think that
Shit dude, I don't think that because the author quoted al-Ghazali that means they think Iran is a wonderland because that country once produced a thinker that is still worth drawing on today.
If the author critiques
If the author critiques Western society and points in a different direction by drawing on thought outside the Western tradition, then all that means is that they are drawing on thought from outside the Western tradition.
It is not some kind of romanticization of non-Western societies to say "here is a concept from this society that illustrates what I am trying to talk about."
But isn't that the point of
But isn't that the point of the article? Are non-western societies reflections of their former selves or are they reflections of a poisoned westernized existence as Cesaire would have it?
Let's get one thing
Let's get one thing straight:
The "West" has been quite quantitatively demonstrably, by far, and of orders of magnitude,
the most killing, murdering, and genociding enterprise in human history.
No romanticising or demonising necessary. Strictly by the empirical numbers.
Once you come to realise that, there is a new perspective and context.
Only by superior capacity,
Only by superior capacity, intellectual and spiritual, not by some moral inferiority. That's what you need to get straight. The "West" did what no other civilization could do in developing the scientific method and unlocking the mysteries of the physical universe, therein lies its uniqueness. Killing & genocide are endemic and universal. There is your new perspective. The question then becomes, how did the West come to its superior position and its superior means, does it still have the capacity to maintain and expand its position and means, and, if so, what will it take to do so?
China has the number 1
China has the number 1 economy there now, Champ.
So sorry, Game Over.
Yeah, looks like the Chinkies
Yeah, looks like the Chinkies beat your Superior Intellectual and Spiritual Capacity (SISC).
Sorry Snow White. (SSW)
Part of the author's point is
Part of the author's point is that the "East" we know today is the result of the process of colonization. His emphasis was on the philosophies developed by pre-colonial non-Western civilizations, and I don't think he held up any modern society as an Oriental ideal. As someone who comes from outside "the West" I'm sick of this unrealistic hippe dream as well, but I don't think there's much of that in this article.
Gee thanks for the lesson
Gee thanks for the lesson Beav. You sure put us straight.
I thought we killed all the
I thought we killed all the muslims!
We have been trying to kill
We have been trying to kill them for a long time. But after a thousand years of Crusades, Europe is worried about Muslims becoming the majority.
The centre of gravity of the Crusades now appears to have shifted Westward to USA, and we hear that Islam is the fastest growing religion here?
A new approach is definitely needed. As a child I was taught "It is essential that the mind control your heart, but sometimes let it be alone." We never allow that ever.
The eye reports the
The eye reports the immediate, the present, the now, and is overwhelmed by it. The eye works with inorganic logic that has certainty made possible by narrowness of vision.
The heart works with organic fuzzy logic that tries to deal with the totality of the scene from beginning of time to the end of time. The heart sees with the eyes of all others, and is vaguely aware of countless possibilities.
The likes of Buddha, Jesus, and Mohammad saw with their heart, and humanity admires and emulate them to this day.
Too bad, we never produced
Too bad, we never produced anyone like Buda, Jesus or Mohamed. I wonder why?
Not to sound crass, but the
Not to sound crass, but the US has produced Joseph Smith, L. Ron Hubbard, JZ Knight. These folks have started movements and there is no reason to believe they are going to go away. It's easy to imagine that in 1000 years L. Ron Hubbard will be venerated the same way Jesus is today.
Exactly. There is no reason
Exactly. There is no reason to believe that in the distant future we won't be venerated as the highest culture and most superior society (actually the USA not Canada) that ever existed or ever will exist.
You imply that you know some
You imply that you know some difference between Canada and USA.
Please share your thoughts with us and tell us what you think the differences are.
[quote] By discussing
[quote] By discussing "Western modernity" as some singular thing [end quote]
Maybe the Hegelian synthesis of the main post and this criticism is the oneness that both come to. That "Western modernity" seems to me to be the dualism of rational thought, that having the power to blind us to our oneness which the heart-spirit-soul-geist knows
The statement that "this
The statement that "this shift in the geopolitics of knowledge involves a turn away from Descartes and Western modernity's centering of human consciousness in the mind, to a recentering of consciousness in the spiritual heart (qalb)" seems to be a bit deceptive. It is unfair to say that Western thought has placed value exclusively in the mind, the rational, the logistikon, or the intellect. About 200 years after Descartes, German philosopher Georg Hegel developed the idea of the geist as the fundamental driving force in the world. While it may be true that geist did involve humankind's unique ability for rational thought, it by no means excludes "spiritual heart" of being. In many ways the spiritual heart is what Hegel was striving to find. His rejection of Kantian logic led him to construct a view in which existence did not solely rely on rationality and thought.
I find the statement above to be quite disingenuous and in maybe ways it degrades the argument you are trying to make. By discussing "Western modernity" as some singular thing you are guilty of the very same types of activities your advocate against.
To what extent has Western
To what extent has Western society been influenced by Hegel as compared to the the dualistic Cartesian and mechanistic Newtonian philosophies? Aside from being the precursor to existentialism, which is primarily an intellectual endeavor and often leads to nihilism, his impact has been no where near as influential on mainstream society.
With that said, in my opinion I think the author's argument still stands.